Gov. Perdue has put together a website for tracking the state’s accountability of how it spends federal stimulus funds, or the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).

The website includes a video of Governor Perdue’s directives to state agency leaders given during a meeting last month. Direct links with contact information to each state agency are provided so that anyone can ask questions regarding funding, timelines, the grant process and other issues for a specific agency.

For example, here is a link showing a grant to the Dept. of Community Health.

There are also links to federal and local governments and associations that will play a role in receiving stimulus dollars.

Georgians can also report fraud and abuse to the Office of the State Inspector General.

Link to the new site here.

Absent of hard details , President Obama’s speech yesterday (3/10/09) outlined an education reform program that places emphasis on expansion of charter schools and incentive pay for outstanding teachers.  Less pronounced is the planned increase added investment to early learning, yet this could provide the foundation for the entire program’s success.

Read

The full text of the president’s speech in pdf format is available here.

The following  message was sent March 3, 2009 to board members and supporters of the Georgia Partnership for Excellence in Education (www.gpee.org), a policy think tank, development and advocacy group founded by the Georgia Chamber of Commerce and Georgia Economic Developers Association in 1990 to improve educational outcomes.

These people actually know about education and how it can be improved, yet state legislators seemingly don’t avail themselves to this resource.  What follows is a repudiation of a school voucher initiative in the General Assembly.

In these turbulent times, when money is tight and expectations are high, practitioners and policymakers often look for innovative strategies that will result in educational improvements. One strategy that continues to emerge in discussion and legislation is the use of school vouchers.  You will find it discussed in our annual Top Ten Issues to Watch report.

Based upon a thorough review of research, political history, and policy implications, the Georgia Partnership believes that vouchers are not the silver bullet reform mechanism for which some policymakers are searching. Georgia’s students need a commitment from policymakers and practitioners to focus on systemic reforms that will bring the promise of educational excellence to every classroom in the state.

The Partnership relies on research to evaluate policies and drive decision-making.  However, despite the theory that competition and parental choice should improve the public education system, empirical research about the impacts of voucher programs generates as many questions as definitive answers.  To date there is no consensus among researchers that vouchers significantly improve students’ academic opportunities or outcomes.

In 2008, researchers from Princeton University and the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago conducted a review of existing research on the impact of education vouchers on student achievement and concluded that “the best research to date finds relatively small achievement gains for students offered education vouchers, most of which are not statistically different from zero.”

In recent years, increased school accountability and the rise of business-inspired educational practices have brought private-sector expectations for performance and accountability for results to the forefront of the public school arena. Consequently, it would be expected that any new legislation concerning vouchers would require that private schools receiving taxpayer dollars adhere to the following practices: employ fully certified teachers; administer standardized tests used by the state to measure student achievement and report the results to the public; and publish the manner in which they expend the public monies they receive.

Voucher legislation that does not address these three concerns should not be supported. Georgia has made great strides in the quest to provide an excellent education for all its youth, and now is not the time to derail our progress by enacting single-issue reforms. To build a world-class education system and workforce, we must collaborate and focus our efforts on a comprehensive plan for school success – a plan that replaces random acts with a focus on the interconnectedness of issues impacting our student achievement.

The issue of summer break and how long it should be has been brewing in Georgia for a few years now.

It stands to reason that most parents would be relieved to have their kids in school rather than have to juggle work schedules, pay for expensive camps and find other diversions.  Then again, most swimming pool life guards are high school kids.  And the reduced vehicular traffic in metro Atlanta sure is nice.

But in an age when our kids have to compete with those in the rest of the world who outperform them, is the position of having longer summer breaks defensible?

Read more

The following is from Pat Willis, executive director of Voices for Georgia’s Children.

Georgia began last year looking at a growing reserve fund, but begins a new year with budget cutting and juggling of finances like most other states to stay afloat. That’s just the reality and there’s no way around it. It’s important now to get through these tough times and maintain a solid foundation for future growth when better times return. And they will.

Congress passed economic recovery legislation to jump start the process which includes large-scale spending on infrastructure.  Given the current global outlook, these are important moves to create jobs.  But how can we, as a country and state, make this long-term debt pay off for future generations rather than burdening our children and grandchildren with payments for years to come?  If a healthy portion of the spending is devoted to strategic investments in our children, we could set in motion an economic stimulus that may keep paying us a healthy return for decades to come.

Even in the best of times, Georgia’s children haven’t fared well.  Their health, education, safety, and employability outcomes have consistently rated among the lowest in the country as underscored by Georgia’s ranking of 40th in meeting its children’s needs according the 2008 Kids Count report issued by the Annie E. Casey Foundation.  That ranking doesn’t bode well for Georgia’s future economic growth.

But we can step up in rankings while improving our financial prospects if all of us — consumers, educators, business leaders, clergy and legislators — step up for our children.  Let’s take a look at what a stimulus package might look like in terms of priorities:

Education Pre-Kindergarten (Pre-K) builds a foundation for higher educational achievement, which in turn creates higher earning potential. President-elect Obama’s announced $10 billion investment in early learning is a significant leap of faith, but it remains to be seen how that program will be implemented.  Georgia’s lottery-funded Pre-K program hasn’t met its original promise to four-year olds as slots are limited and participation has never exceeded 56 percent.  Thousands of children are on waiting lists for available slots.  Using the economic stimulus package to build quality centers can help take care of the waiting list and operations can be supported without additional taxpayer or federal dollars by tapping existing lottery reserve funds.

Child care With about 300,000 Georgia mothers of children under six in the workforce and 14,000 families on waiting lists for Georgia child care subsidies, how can we expect a productive, reliable workforce?  Research shows that just $1 invested in a high quality child care program resulted in a public benefit of $7.16.  Based on current services, when we combine child care and Pre-K in the state, we infuse $2.4 billion in gross receipts into the economy, and we support $13.6 billion in parental earnings.

Child abuse prevention Georgia’s children must be safe, especially in their own homes.  Yet, 50 percent of Georgia’s abuse and neglect cases, close to 20,000 cases in 2005, occur among 0-6 year olds.   Home visitation and other family supports could greatly ameliorate this problem, save child welfare dollars down the road, and strengthen family self sufficiency in the short and long run.

Health Studies show accessible, consistent medical care allows more kids to grow up to be healthier, more productive adults.  Georgia’s health coverage for children ranks in the bottom third of states in terms of access and quality.  About 300,000 of Georgia’s children are uninsured and vulnerable. Georgia’s State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), “PeachCare for Kids”, which is designed to insure children in working families, should get a boost from the recently passed SCHIP reauthorization in Congress, but Georgia legislators must still decide on spending and eligibility.

Juvenile Justice In 2006, 2,631 children in Georgia were in juvenile detention and correctional facilities on any given day, enough children for over 100 classrooms. Georgia’s Juvenile Code, the laws that set the rules and procedures that govern the way that the Juvenile Court addresses deprived and delinquent children, is out-dated, disorganized and difficult to apply to contemporary situations.  It should be updated in short order.

These are some of the most pressing needs that will only cost the state more in the long term if we do nothing. We need to be smart.  It is essential to embrace the idea of tax dollars spent on children not an expense but as an investment that saves money later and, most importantly, ultimately generates tax revenues from healthy, productive adults.  If our governments are committed to spending hundreds of billions of our tax dollars in the coming months on infrastructure as a means of economic stimulus, why don’t we demand that they look beyond physical roads and bridges?  After all, children make up the foundation – infrastructure, if you will – of our society’s future prospects that can be the highway for global competitiveness and economic growth.

We can’t afford to panic now.  Let’s stimulate the economy and, at the same time, stimulate prospects for our kids with smart investment.

Pat Willis is executive director of Voices for Georgia’s Children. Voices engages in research, analysis and advocacy to assist the state’s leadership in developing sound policy decisions that improve the well being of children. The independent non-profit seeks to build consensus on a long-term agenda based on measurable goals that will significantly impact children’s health, safety, education, connectedness and employability.

The Obama administration’s health care spending provisions in the proposed economic stimulus bill included money for family planning services.  As the headline states, that funding may be dropped for political appeasement.

Why?  Opponents consider family planning as a contraceptives dispensing service or other form of  societal threat.  In reality, the services extend to women’s health screenings and prenatal care.

Will spending on family services stimulate the economy or create jobs immediately?  Of course not.  Neither will all the Medicaid and other health spending included in the stimulus package.  But in a time when people will be struggling for any health care at all, it can prevent a further drain on the economy.

Read

Georgia figures prominently in this NY Times article on job losses creating an overwhelming burden on government-funded healthcare.

A Gwinnett County women is foregoing medical treatment since losing her job and benefits, although her daughter is covered under PeachCare.    DCH commissioner Dr. Rhonda Medows is quoted at the end of the article  about how this economy prevents any estimate of  how wide the coverage gap might be.

Demand for services predictably rise and fall with the economy and employment numbers.   Why can’t there be a funding structure in place to ensure reserves are built during flush economic times to cover shortfalls during a downturn?

Read

Among a number of policies that the Obama administration plans to rescind is the requirement for states wanting to boost health coverage for children in families with higher incomes to prove that 95 percent of children in households with incomes under 200 percent of poverty are covered first.

This requirement is virtually impossible to document.

Read

A group of researchers will begin tracking the health of individual children from birth to 21 in select parts of the country to understand causes and influences of disease.

The Five Healthy Steps program espoused by Voices for Georgia’s Children isn’t that far-reaching, although collecting data during exams of all children in the state in five key health indicators can help Georgia identify trends that could lead to better policies for preventive care.

Read

The Georgia Children’s Advocacy Network (GA-CAN!) met on Friday, Jan. 9 for its annual pre-Legislative Session meeting to help get advocates’ minds around the next session of the Georgia General Assembly and identify priorities for children and families.  The session, incidentally, starts today.

The AJC’s Maureen Downey offered her observations on Georgia’s political climate and the uphill climb for child advocates wanting to make inroads with the state’s political leaders.  You can watch the video of her remarks here.

A striking note in Maureen’s talk was when she pointed out the absence of male legislators trying to move Georgia forward by improve outcomes for children.  Female legislators typically haul that freight, which is a difficult battle under any circumstances given their minority status and the “traditional values” orientation of their male counterparts.  Initiatives for meaningful policy change are usually left to the same, small group of women in the House and Senate.

Just where are the men in the Georgia General Assembly?

We know they’re there.  We know many of them can draw the correlation to children and the state’s social and economic health.  So why won’t they help lead the charge?

And for that matter, where are the men in the ranks of the advocates?  They are grossly underrepresented in this constiuency as well.

Guys, it’s time to step up.

« Previous PageNext Page »